Found a few books from my high school library; the site won’t let me send the 5000px ones so here are the lowres ones
1978 Skyline on the cover of one
Woolworth Building 1971
Savoy Plaza Hotel, 1927-1965
60 Broadway, 1908-1963
6 Likes
A cool video of Radio Row in 1936 on Cortlandt Street.
Also found out that Dept 56 has a model of the Singer building with lights!
10 Likes
a old Landmark the Claremont built 1812.
Claremont Inn on Riverside Drive and 124th Street from 1902.
Street entrance 1920s.
in the background is Grants Tomb 1930s.
at night
Aerial view of Claremont Inn
6 Likes
Check out this building in Budapest. They torn down some ugly 70s modern crap and built a beautiful classic building instead.
10 Likes
This entire IG thread is full of examples of classic architecture being built.
5 Likes
View from 74 Trinity Place to Hudson River 1928.
Skyline 1931
Edison Building from State Building 1931
99 West Street 1927
Corner Broad & William Street 1929.
Produce Exchange to Telephone Building 1929
One Cedar Street 1929
View from 60 West Street 1930
old Rhinelander Row (Cottage Row) 7th Avenue between 12th and 13th.
View from the Heckscher Building 1929
8 Likes
The german light cruiser S.M.S. (Seiner Majestät Schiff) Dresden in Harbor from New York 1909 in background is the Riverside Drive.
7 Likes
Something like this in NYC would be 
3 Likes
The British author Douglas Adams had this to say about airports: “Airports are ugly. Some are very ugly. Some attain a degree of ugliness that can only be the result of special effort.” Sadly, this truth is not applicable merely to airports: it can also be said of most contemporary architecture.
-
Take the Tour Montparnasse, a black, slickly glass-panelled skyscraper, looming over the beautiful Paris cityscape like a giant domino waiting to fall. Parisians hated it so much that the city was subsequently forced to enact an ordinance forbidding any further skyscrapers higher than 36 meters. — Or take Boston’s City Hall Plaza. Downtown Boston is generally an attractive place, with old buildings and a waterfront and a beautiful public garden. But Boston’s City Hall is a hideous concrete edifice of mind-bogglingly inscrutable shape, like an ominous component found left over after you’ve painstakingly assembled a complicated household appliance.
-
There’s a whole additional complex of equally unpleasant federal buildings attached to the same plaza, designed by Walter Gropius, an architect whose chuckle-inducing surname belies the utter cheerlessness of his designs. The John F. Kennedy Building, for example—featurelessly grim on the outside, infuriatingly unnavigable on the inside—is where, among other things, terrified immigrants attend their deportation hearings, and where traumatized veterans come to apply for benefits. Such an inhospitable building sends a very clear message, which is: the government wants its lowly supplicants to feel confused, alienated, and afraid.
-
The fact is, contemporary architecture gives most regular humans the heebie-jeebies. Try telling that to architects and their acolytes, though, and you’ll get an earful about why your feeling is misguided, the product of some embarrassing misconception about architectural principles. One defense, typically, is that these eyesores are, in reality, incredible feats of engineering. After all, “blobitecture”—which, we regret to say, is a real school of contemporary architecture—is created using complicated computer-driven algorithms! You may think the ensuing blob-structure looks like a tentacled turd, or a crumpled kleenex, but that’s because you don’t have an architect’s trained eye.
-
Another thing you will often hear from design-school types is that contemporary architecture is honest. It doesn’t rely on the forms and usages of the past, and it is not interested in coddling you and your dumb feelings. Wake up, sheeple! Your boss hates you, and your bloodsucking landlord too, and your government fully intends to grind you between its gears. That’s the world we live in! Get used to it! Fans of Brutalism—the blocky-industrial-concrete school of architecture—are quick to emphasize that these buildings tell it like it is, as if this somehow excused the fact that they look, at best, dreary, and, at worst, like the headquarters of some kind of post-apocalyptic totalitarian dictatorship.
-
Some unseen person or force seems committed to replacing literally every attractive and appealing thing with an ugly and unpleasant thing. The architecture produced by contemporary global capitalism is possibly the most obvious visible evidence that it has some kind of perverse effect on the human soul. Of course, there is no accounting for taste, and there may be some among us who are naturally are deeply disposed to appreciate blobs and blocks. But polling suggests that devotees of contemporary architecture are overwhelmingly in the minority: aside from monuments, few of the public’s favorite structures are from the postwar period.
-
The politics of this issue, moreover, are all upside-down. For example, how do we explain why, in the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower tragedy in London, more conservative commentators were calling for more comfortable and home-like public housing, while left-wing writers staunchly defended the populist spirit of the high-rise apartment building, despite ample evidence that the majority of people would prefer not to be forced to live in or among such places? Conservatives who critique public housing may have easily-proven ulterior motives, but why so many on the left are wedded to defending unpopular schools of architectural and urban design is less immediately obvious.
-
For about 2,000 years, everything human beings built was beautiful, or at least unobjectionable. The 20th century put a stop to this, evidenced by the fact that people often go out of their way to vacation in “historic” (read: beautiful) towns that contain as little postwar architecture as possible. But why? What actually changed? Why does there seem to be such an obvious break between the thousands of years before World War II and the postwar period? And why does this seem to hold true everywhere? — A few obvious stylistic changes characterize postwar architecture. For one, what is (now somewhat derisively) called “ornament” disappeared. At the dawn of the 20th century, American architect Louis Sullivan proclaimed the famous maxim that “form follows function.”
-
Plant life is actually one of the most important elements of architecture. One of the most serious problems with postwar architecture is that so much of its entirely devoid of nature. It presents us with blank walls and wide-open spaces with nary a tree or shrub to be seen. Generally speaking, the more plant life is in a place, the more attractive it is, and the less nature there is, the uglier it is. This is because nature is much better at designing things than we are. In fact, even Brutalist structures almost look livable if you let plants grow all over them; they might even be downright attractive if you let the plants cover every last square inch of concrete.
-
Frank Lloyd Wright’s Guggenheim Museum is an impressive building. Unfortunately, it doesn’t bear any actually relationship to its surroundings; it could have been placed anywhere. Wright’s Fallingwater house, on the other hand, was designed to cohere with its location. Aesthetic coherence is very important; a sense of place depends on every element in that place working together. The streets of the Beacon Hill neighborhood in Boston are beautiful because there are many different elements, but they are all aesthetically unified. The Tour Montparnasse in Paris is horrifying, because it doesn’t flow with the surrounding buildings and draws attention to itself. Capitalism eats culture, and it makes ugly places. Money has no taste.
-
It should be obvious to anyone that skyscrapers should be abolished. After all, they embody nearly every bad tendency in contemporary architecture: they are not part of nature, they are monolithic, they are boring, they have no intricacy, and they have no democracy. Besides, there is plenty of space left on earth to spread out horizontally; the only reasons to spread vertically are phallic and Freudian. Architect Leon Krier has suggested that while there should be no height limit on buildings, no building should ever be more than four stories (so, spires as tall as you like, and belfries). This seems a completely sensible idea. But more than just abolishing skyscrapers, we must create a world of everyday wonder, a world in which every last thing is a beautiful thing. If this sounds impossible, it isn’t; for thousands of years, nearly every buildings humans made was beautiful.
1 Like
While I don’t 100% agree with everything I do agree that modern architecture has largely been a failed experiment. I think the fact that people regard old world cities as the best is proof of that.
There are some examples of beautiful modern architecture but they are few and far between (FLW comes to mind). their seems to be a collective distain these days towards glass box after glass box.
Time to start building the classics again. 
1 Like
Insisting architects build in the style of the past is like insisting musicians play only classical music.
2 Likes
Let me re-phrase that, not saying build in a classical style. I’m saying that most people don’t enjoy modern architecture. There are only so many way you can build a glass box.
Maybe it’s time to switch things up.
1 Like
Modern architecture is such a broad category that you can’t really say that most people don’t enjoy it. Not all modern architecture are glass boxes. Even the classical-esque buildings of Stern uses plenty of modern architectural techniques. While classical buildings are timeless, there’s also something beautiful when modern architecture is used to renovate and energize classical designs. Like Carlo Scarpa’s Castelvecchio Museum, Herzog and De Meuron’s CaixaForum Madrid and more locally, the renovations to Lincoln Center by Diller Scofidio + Renfro. I would think people enjoy the architecture of the Winter Garden, Rockefeller Plaza, and even the Empire Stores in DUMBO. The thing about modern architecture is that it’s always switching things up! You can’t say that about classic buildings.
2 Likes
the entire world loves Europe for its modern architecture?
1 Like
Of course! I also won’t deny that modern architecture and Europe haven’t always gotten along lol (like the Kunsthaus Graz Museum, which is awful…). But again, “modern architecture” is much more than just glass boxes. In Europe especially, there has been a concerted effort to blend modern and classical architecture to enhance both designs. The Louvre and the expansion done by I.M. Pei is a great example of that. So is the redevelopment of the Battersea Power Station and the Tate Modern in London. I’m pretty sure they are all beloved city landmarks and world-renowned institutions. I’d put the Morgan Library in Manhattan in that category.
Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli by Herzog & De Meuron
Royal Opera House by Stanton Williams
La Porte Romaine by Foster & Partners
Extension/ Renovation in France by Vulcano + Gibello
Last post on this. Sorry to take up so much space… We can chat about this through PM if you’d like @robermat. Just wanted to say that not all modern architecture is bad and that its such a broad list of styles. “Modern” architecture has done a great job of enhancing the presence of classical buildings that help bring it into the 21st century. Should move forward and not stay complacent!
6 Likes
I agree, but I think the problem with the “good” modern architecture is very few and far between.
1 Like
Agreed. Hopefully we get less of bad architecture and more good ones!
3 Likes
Verizon Building going up
The East River, Brooklyn Bridge and Manhattan Bridge on a smoggy day from the 58th floor of the World Trade Center. 1975. New York by Andy Blair, on Flickr
View out my dad’s office in the World Trade Center North Tower on the 58th floor looking northeast to the Woolworth Building, the Manhattan Bridge, the East River and the New York Telephone Company building under construction. New York. April 1975 by Andy Blair, on Flickr
10 Likes