Taken yesterday
Thanks for the pictures baronson. The 2nd picture makes me sad.
Lol what time did you take that, mightve passed eachother along the way .
2pm - don’t tell me you were riding a float in the India Day Parade…because somebody did wave to me lol!
Missed you by a couple of hours then, so that definitely wasn’t me, I passed by about 2 or so hours later near 4.
I’d been a while since I intentionally walked by this building since it’s off my normal walking route, but I wanted to see if there were any possible signs of cladding, which there weren’t.
The actual building is also now visible from Edge, it’s going to look like a stick.
But no longer “ the best seat in the house” for the Empire State Building (referencing the poster in the photo).
The “Use Cases” section of this webpage offers some interesting details on the MEP Mechanical Electrical Plumbing systems; while also offers stunning graphic images of the completed building. I like this page a lot: a comprehensive look at the project from mechanical/structural details, as well as more general images of the overall completed project.
Excerpt - *
Based on the extensive utility installation knowledge of the utility installation, Nova bypassed subcontractors and created a coordinated layout for all the MEP systems, significantly accelerating the coordination process.
Revit Capacity:
Transformation of Architectural and Engineering CAD background into coordinated 3D Model substantially enhanced accuracy and allowed Developer to assume an active role in resolving design issues.
This tower has gotten very narrow from it’s initial form. The original design has a height to width ratio of 1:18, and with it’s shortened and narrowed new form, it is now 1:22. So it will be 2nd narrowest building in the world (atleast that I can think of) since 111 West 57th St is 1:24.5 or so.
But this narrowing won’t/hasn’t really helped with anything relating to the ESB viewpoint because while it did narrow in footprint in both directions, the E/W faces were the most narrowed.
I wonder how the street level area will be designed.
I’m guessing pretty straightforward.
more photos by Mr. Hershorn:
Nice photos, silly complaint imho. I found an interesting article by someone who clearly also has complaints about this new tower, and would surely agree with Mr. Hershorn’s gripe.
I recall reading about many “wind sway” issues with 432 park - another tall, skinny - that apparantly was not designed/engineered properly: elevator stalls, pipes breaking, walls cracking, etc.
I think this building is the GREAT in term of the aesthetics; we will have to wait and see how the engineering, and “wind sway” issue pans out in the future after occupancy.
Looking forward for this tower to top out soon. What’s the current height as of now?