NEW YORK | Penn Station Expansion/Improvements

There’s a reason experts keep suggesting through-running. It’s a good idea that would deliver a lot of different benefits. The current setup is just not smart.

The obstacles are (mostly) not technical. It would not be difficult to get rolling stock that could run on both overhead and third-rail power. Although it would be “nice” to get the whole system on overhead, that’s probably never going to make financial sense.

If NJT currently needs bi-level trains for capacity, I’m not sure through-running would remove that need. Perhaps with through-running and four tubes under the Hudson, bi-levels might not be necessary anymore, but I have a hunch they’d still need them.

Of course, through-running would be a massive, massive project and the main obstacles are political.

5 Likes

Metro North has trains that can do so (M8’s). The biggest issue is that the New York Central decided to use under-running third rail when they electrified in the early 1900s while the LIRR and PRR use top-running third rail. This alone makes things complex since the M8 trains cannot switch from top to bottom running third rail on the fly although they do have the capability to run on the LIRR. Another problem is that the M8’s lack the required transformers for the PRR 25Hz electrification used in NJ and points south which would make the trains heavier or take up more space.

If the NJT really wanted to through-run into Long Island, they can simply run the ALP45DP’s on diesel once they’re out of the overhead catenary of Sunnyside yard. This is what Amtrak will do when they decide to run trains into Long Island.

Another option for the LIRR would be to extend third rail to Secaucus and build a storage yard nearby. The 3rd rail already runs to the entrance of the Hudson tubes to permit Amtrak’s dual mode P32AC-DM’s to run into Penn.

1 Like

Thru-running makes no sense. It isn’t smart. It doesn’t benefit either constituent agency. No one at MTA or NJT is talking or thinking about thru-running. The End.

This is just objectively false

14 Likes

Agree. :+1:

Through running could be as simple as running LIRR and Metro North Penn Access trains to Secaucus and NJ Transit to a new station in Sunnyside. A more robust through running setup would have Metro North running down the NEC, LIRR diesel dual modes running to Port Jervis and Spring Valley via a new Secaucus loop, and NJ Transit serving Port Washington via dual diesel dual modes and or Jamaica station.

2 Likes
4 Likes
10 Likes

307 West 30th Street

1 Like

Unlikely to be landmarked.

1 Like

Per the timeline,Aren’t they(Amtrak) suppose to revel the short listed proposals for Penn station redevelopment by now?

which timeline?

source: Penn Station Transformation Fact Sheet - Amtrak Media

5 Likes

We have a shortlist, we have a shortlist!

Yesterday, Amtrak announced three shortlisted “master developers” for New York Penn Station’s redesign. The shortlisted groups are: Penn Forward Now, led by Fengate Capital; Penn Transformation Now, by Halmar International; and Grand Penn Partners, by Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation.

9 Likes

Wow, we might actually see the ASTM proposal happen! I’m pretty sure it would’ve been a no-brainer when first proposed, if not for Janno Lieber standing in the way.

I’m very excited to see what the Penn Forward SOM/Grimshaw/Arup team produces, though. Grimshaw in particular has honed an expertise in starchitect-quality transportation design. News coming soon?

2 Likes

That’s good, but unfortunately the Grand Penn plan was also chosen in the shortlist of proposals…

2 Likes

Grand Penn moves MSG across the street and uses classical architecture.

That would be ideal.

1 Like

That plan poorly mimics classical architecture though, while also still burying the majority of the station underneath a park as well as slapping some tasteless additions to what was already an expensive and nice renovation at the base of Penn 2.

I’m also not sure if Dolan was actually involved in the proposal to just outright move the arena to where they are proposing to move it.

11 Likes

We can disagree on the “tasteless” additions. I think the design at 343 is crap, you don’t. It’s okay.

What I will say: Grand Penn also incorporates through running, while the Halmar plan does not.

Yes, and 350 Park will be the most bland glass (which is just all glass) building in the city when built. We can agree to disagree as you said.

The majority of people do not like the Grand Penn proposal, it has nothing to do with taste, which this also isnt a taste thing, it is quite literally trying to mimic what was an actual grand building in the original Penn Station and very much poorly mimicking it in a fashion that does not reflect or respect the original station.

9 Likes

Grand Penn has the best connections to the Trump admin, and Mr. Trump prefers classical architecture, and removing MSG and incorporating through running are clearly the best ways to make this area of Manhattan a grand front porch.

The towers that will be built in the area would connect with Hudson Yards and the PABT and Times Square and Midtown, thereby creating the single greatest skyscraper district in the known world.

1 Like