NEW YORK | 255 E. 77th | 535 FT | 36 FLOORS

7 Likes
2 Likes
2 Likes

Bring on the Stern, or Pennoyer, etc.

2 Likes

Looks promising, definitely another traditional NYC style tower:

8 Likes
4 Likes

Another day another skyscraper

5 Likes

Looks like a mix of 200 E. 83 and 220 CPS.

1 Like

More information via Patch.

11 Likes

13 Likes

Photo by Michael Young

11 Likes

Photo by Michael Young

3 Likes

12 Likes

12 Likes

Here’s the poster child for affordable housing. New building houses fewer people than the old properties.

4 Likes
5 Likes

10 Likes

Another ‘classic beauty’ on the way… :heart_eyes:

I find every RAMSA building - or classical architecture in general - to be quite “delightful” . However, I am a strict modernist when it comes to my preferences for any new Architectural addition to this city.

This curious case of ambivalence led me to question why “classical” architecture would be the preferred architectural style for so many people in these ‘modern’ times. It is a well established fact that the resale - and general popularity - of classical buildings far outperform that of modernist buildings. That too, I find puzzling. :woozy_face:

These are nothing new - but still relevant.

I enjoyed listening to the podcast, and then reading the article - both posted below - which gave me some insight into the classical vs modernist quandary. Enjoy.

Here is a short podcast discussion -

This a more in-depth read on the subject -

1 Like

14 Likes

11 Likes