NEW YORK | 111 Murray St | 792 FT | 58 FLOORS

19 Likes

11 Likes

https://www.instagram.com/p/B1yl7zpFQxK/?igshid=mtb2u2l80bjp

13 Likes

https://www.instagram.com/p/B2U3JuMn7Dp/?igshid=1bhrjp1nn9bq5

8 Likes

14 Likes

https://www.instagram.com/p/B2nwTjzgh3K/?igshid=28kac206hlmd

11 Likes

Penthouse for sale: $40,ooo,000 million dollars. Take a tour - if this link opens. That is Forty Million Dollars: wow.

https://streeteasy.com/building/111-murray-street/ph2[https://streeteasy.com/building/111-murray-street/ph2](https://streeteasy.com/building/111-murray-street/ph2)

1 Like

That’s 10 million more than a full floor penthouse in 30 Park Place with four terraces, which has been languishing. They’re dreaming.

1 Like

https://www.instagram.com/p/B2zMtnlgRe6/?igshid=dqlud0td7e4l

11 Likes

https://www.instagram.com/p/B3gM0HwA9Vp/?igshid=el0j3ntjzoe5
Where. Is. The. Crown. Lights.

9 Likes

Must have been scrapped. I live across the street and never see them, nor does it look like there is any equipment for them

1 Like

That crown is a fine design; elegant bifurcated swooping upward curves one could say in Archi-speak. It is unfortunate that crane must be permanently (and obtrusively) perched on top in plane sight. I think it as needed for window washing and/or maintenance on the facade.

2 Likes

Indeed; this is the view from my window:


Almost hidden, but not quite. They have angled it to try to hide it as much as possible but from a distance it is still quite noticeable.

10 Likes

11 Likes

https://www.instagram.com/p/B32I9vsHfnE/?igshid=7te1ujf3b0jv

10 Likes

Anyone know if the BMU final placement will be below the parapet? Would be a shame to mar a beautiful building with a high placement.

2 Likes

There is just no hiding that thing on top: unfortunate. This building has a truly elegant shape, and a smoothly refined facade, the mechanical equipment at the top will have to be overlooked as best as… possible.th-1

7 Likes

And it’s not just the BMU. It’s also the bulkhead that sits below it, which is highly visible from the west. I simply don’t understand going to the trouble of designing and building something that is, as you say @infoshare, elegant and refined only to top it off with something positively inelegant and unrefined. How much money is saved by not extending the facade ever so slightly higher I wonder? KPF’s Madison Square Tower is another disappointing example, looking particularly awful from the south.

Sadly, another recent (and otherwise attractive) KPF building-- 260 Kent–follows suit.

14 Likes

Wow…I had not seen this view. If I did not know better, I would assume that clutter at the top was some temporary equipment for finishing up the construction on the building. I do know better, and that mechanical equipment is a permanent fixture on top; looks awful.

1 Like

Ridiculous. What a waste of a beautiful architectural idea. This is a lesson in how to make a really nice building stink. Too bad for all of us who live or work in the city.

3 Likes