I guess I am in both camps. I actually like the building a lot, just not where it was plopped.
Now that I think about, it’s around the same height of its tombstone looking brother near Penn Station - 1 Penn Plaza. I wouldn’t mind it this tower sat there instead.
I think Metlife is a nice building. It is very different from any other building. It has a peculiar shape, being long in one direction and slim at the same time. It’s not a marvel of architecture, but it’s something different that only exists in New York.
MetLife is a modernist redesign of 30 Rockefeller Center and part of an ongoing study of the slab as skyscraper form that continued with 1 Penn Plaza and now likely Chase’s 270 Park Ave.
James Ruderman Engineers designed the structure of both MetLife and 1 Penn as well as pseudo-slabs like the W.R. Grace and GM buildings.
To me, the MetLife building is like pug dogs and hairless cats: so ugly it becomes cool. It’s not mundanely ugly like the Verizon building on Pearl street. You see the Verizon building, think “Wow, that’s an ugly building”, and then you forget about it. MetLife, on the other hand, sticks with you. It’s provocatively ugly. There’s nothing quite like seeing that 800 foot slab looming over Park Avenue.
When I was a teenager, I bought the coffee table book “Skyscrapers” by Judith Dupre, the version at the time (1996/7) was this one:
And I remember the picture of the Metlife/Pan Am Bldg was pretty darn awesome, can’t find it online! But almost 60 years on, opinions of the building have not budged!