NEW YORK | 625 Madison Ave | 684 FT | 34 FLOORS

https://www.instagram.com/p/DaB8q11MbTj/?igsh=MTE0bWZyMDhpM2Nmag==

This company is starting to supply the reinforced steel.

3 Likes

In the first pic you can see what looks like a steel object with studs at the east end of the site, I assume for some kind of reinforced concrete retaining wall. Maybe related?

Speaking of Related, seems like they love concrete office buildings wherever possible. I wonder if this one will be.

11 Likes
14 Likes
17 Likes

What’s the approximate floorplate size for 625?

4 Likes

I don’t know anything beyond the renders, but they can’t be that huge if this will be ~45 floors 850k sf: Average less than 20k per floor.

I do notice they’re using the steel pipes method for shoring up the perimeter wall.

16 Likes
14 Likes

https://www.wsj.com/real-estate/commercial/ralph-laurens-polo-bar-in-talks-to-move-to-a-new-office-tower-35314ee2

https://www.costar.com/article/1055869200/general-atlantic-pursues-anchor-lease-at-relateds-625-madison-office-tower

This one has momentum

8 Likes
7 Likes

It looks pretty bad between the Pierre and the Sherry Netherland.

6 Likes

I kinda agree.. It would look muuuch better with a more square shape than the rectangular shape it has in that Central Park render (screen grab’d below). Alternatively, if it had some sort of nested, setback’d crown, that would greatly improve the visuals.

It looked more square in the original rendering:

They could’ve even made the cladding a more tan/light gold color to make it more contextual with the classical surroundings.

10 Likes

Also is it just me or is that Central Park render’s perspective a little bit off?? Shouldn’t it be a bit more obscured by the General Motors Building?.. since it’s right on the next block over from it, right across Madison Ave. I could be wrong, but just asking.

8 Likes

Why did they have to downsize it so much

2 Likes

Good catch! They intentionally photoshopped like a 1/3rd of the building out so you could see this building fully.

7 Likes

684 feet tall

2 Likes

Not the next supertall?

10 Likes

Age of… oh​:wilted_flower:

5 Likes

Looks terribly contextually. Both shorter and uglier than its surroundings

8 Likes

This is the largest version they’ve come up with by square footage because of the larger floors in an office building.

The resi supertall would’ve been really skinny, but top of the office market is really strong right now and this site checks more boxes for a high end office building. Related is drooling over the idea of rents approaching $400/sf; potentially the highest in the city.

That said I’m not impressed by the design and surprised it’s not more along the lines of 45 floors/800 feet like 70 Hudson Yards (70 is much larger at 1.4M v 0.85M).

4 Likes

I know they want more square footage and bigger floors but I just wish this was a supertall

4 Likes