NEW YORK | Gansevoort Sq (832 Washington St) | 600 FT| FLOORS

Great height but terrible design. I wonder what the approved design looks like.

2 Likes

Knowing this city the approved design is probably even more dull

11 Likes

Absurdly out of scale.

3 Likes

Who cares. That’s a NIMBY talking point. It’s only out of scale because nothings been built up around it which will eventually happen

3 Likes

Unlikely. Landmarked district.

1 Like

You are the main part of the problem with housing costs, Boomer.

There are very few buildings in this district important enough to stick around forever.

The Landmarks Committee can rescind the status. It just would take a very influential developer or politician to make it happen.

With the way housing prices are going, who knows what happens 10-20-30 years down the line.

This is New York. We have tall buildings. Get over it.

Well if rudeness is on the menu, here goes. This town isn’t made so you can edge while looking at towers on your screen. Try going to Europe to see how they develop their cities. NYC in particular isn’t like the rest of USA. Broaden your horizons, dweeb.

2 Likes

Why are many people on here so aggressive.

We like to talk about buildings. It’s not that deep. Let’s just be chill and respectful to each other.

15 Likes

Europe is a museum with sub-1% economic growth.

No thanks.

And there you have it ladies and gentlemen.

4 Likes

Me when I sacrifice every quality in life for that extra 1% of economic growth:

10 Likes

Is it weird I like it? Maybe bland but fairly handsome and the height doesn’t really seem that bad especially with the new google towers on West Street

4 Likes

There are still hungry people. Seems important to want growth.

That doesn’t necessitate an ugly eyesore.

It has exactly 0 of the factors that made the twin towers iconic.

1 Like

Can we get back to the topic?

@apophenic

4 Likes

Hell froze over

This facade is very elegant, and tasteful looking from a ‘curbside’ vantage point. The stone, window frame details, various subtle angles along the facade; nice to see a richly detailed modernist design. Modernist work can be quite intricate if done well; this one is quite good.

The Vitruvian Triad comes to mind regarding the ‘usefulness’ feature in the Usefulness/Firmness/Beauty triad.

Those deep set windows have a ‘useful’ function that I think is called the “eyebrow” effect. I am not sure about that term ‘eyebrow’ and/or if IM Pei used that term - but he definitely did go for that Deep-Set-Window effect. The deep set glass becomes glare-free from the direct rays of the sun: they view from inside becomes quite clear and distinct even on sunny days. I recall IM Pei used this feature a lot on many of his buildings in order to get that ‘shadow box’ affect on the windows.

AI Overview
NR Glare and Heat Gain Reduction | NJ Green Building Manual
Yes, deep-set windows inherently help reduce glare by recessing the glass, creating a natural “hood” that blocks harsh, high-angle sunlight, but for full control, combine them with treatments like solar shades, anti-glare films, or tilting blinds to filter light and manage reflections for clear screens and comfortable interiors, says
End AI quote

Good architecture always is always form-follows-function; particularly modernist architecture.

3 Likes

Outside of all the disagreements, some seem to have glanced directly over @BK1985’s post, no need to continue to speak about a design that was not chosen, let’s not make this another 418 11th Ave thread where people keep bringing up a design (2 in that instance) that will never be built as it pertains to the topic’s location.

6 Likes

I realize the overall form-factor is boring; but, that curbside appeal is really nice. That much I hope we can agree on anyway. Cheers.

I think was SO IL who did the desgin - they are always doing really good work.

Here is another nice photo taken from the website posted above: elegant. :star_struck:

3 Likes