NEW YORK | Gansevoort Sq (832 Washington St) | 600 FT| FLOORS

3 Likes

Friends of the High Line executive director Alan van Capelle said he’s had “early conversations with the City and the Whitney Museum” for additional space “to better serve the elevated park’s seven million annual visitors.”

This looks promising

The official press release here:

8 Likes

600 units sounds like it would be a relatively substantial sized building, especially if a portion of the lot is being allotted for an expansion to the museum and space for the HighLine.

4 Likes


CRAINS

10 Likes



„ Image showing a 60-story tower at “Gansevoort Square” in scale to its surroundings; click to expand and see more images.“

4 Likes

heheheh, the monster on the Hudson River!! :wink:

2 Likes

Not tall enough. We have a shortage of 500,000 housing units.

Build as many 60 story towers as possible.

4 Likes


Why does this process take so long? Could it be accelerated?

11 Likes

Sore thumb.

1 Like

https://www.crainsnewyork.com/politics-policy/meatpacking-district-tower-plan-advances-despite-nyc-councilman-erik-bottchers

3 Likes

City of Yes

5 Likes

Per:


https://www.crainsnewyork.com/politics-policy/meatpacking-district-tower-plan-advances-despite-nyc-councilman-erik-bottchers

2 Likes

Per NYguy
https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showpost.php?p=10361024&postcount=36



Good site

6 Likes

Most exciting part here is the Whitney expansion
Hopefully they don’t raise too much fuss about the height of the housing block

4 Likes
4 Likes

Really out of scale.

1 Like

yeah scale looks very bad imo

2 Likes

Just going to have to build more buildings of similar scale nearby eventually :person_shrugging: but the first is always “out of scale”

Anyway I would interpret these drawings put out by the GVSHP with a huge grain of salt–they’re meant to be as ugly and scary as possible to fulfill their agenda of building absolutely nothing ever. They’re not meant to be realistic.

10 Likes

Pretty hard to put up similar buildings in a landmarked area.

Hard ironically because of the same people complaining about this being a sore thumb (GVSHP). Not every building in this area is historic, and they fight against even the ones that aren’t (like this one). There are other developable lots nearby.

1 Like