These buildings need a little breathing room for light and air.
Looking at the windows and balconies in the construction pics, I think we are getting something closer to this rendering:
Cheap-o windows for a cheap-o development
I have come to see all of these new buildings as being one of two types of Architecture: generic architecture, and exceptional architecture. Exceptional Architecture does not always reap the financial rewards it deserves; it is almost a philanthropic endeavor.
This building at 625 Fulton street is a perfect example of generic architecture. The massive scale, simple buildable form, the ease and efficiency of both design & construction will result in a very profitable end product.
Is ‘exceptional’ architecture a wise option in the realm of Real Estate Development: I sometimes wonder.
While I’m disappointed we didn’t get the taller SOM design, the sheer amount of units that this building brings to the table is a good thing in the long run.
Yes I agree. I find ‘generic architecture’ perfectly acceptable. The primary function of these new buildings is shelter/human habitation: and this new design has performed admirably.
The notion that real estate developers are required to build the equivalent of a ‘Public Art installation’ is a common misconception on this forum. I sometimes question the sincerity regarding the outrage often expressed about “hideous” or “ugly” buildings - just silly.
I hope I did not come-off as denigrating this project at 625 Fulton St. - this new building looks FINE.
Oh no not at all, I understood what you were saying. I also agree that not every building will be a complete masterpiece. My greatest disappointment with this specific site is that I sometimes feel that we are running out of sites large enough in downtown Brooklyn that tall towers can be built on.