The Vitruvian triad always comes to mind when seeing these photos or renderings of new buildings. The commentary regarding usefulness/durability/beauty is mostly about the “beauty” of the architectural design: what about the “usefulness” and “durability”.
I find this building to be beautiful or artful regarding the aesthetic appeal; but also wonder how “useful” or how well the program requirements have been met with this design.
The apartments must have a good floor plan, the windows providing good light/views, the interior FF&E furnishings/finishes/equipment must be optimal for the needs of the occupants, etc.
Questions regarding both the “usefulness” and “durability” remain greatly unknown: but IMHO and equally important (perhaps more important) aspect of the project.
Well, that is my pontification on the matter. That being said: I think this building LOOK beautiful… 
Do take note, and always consider the other two aspects of the Vitruvian Triad: Durability & Usefulness. - because that is what makes for truly GOOD DESIGN.
