NEW YORK | Fulton and Elliott-Chelsea Houses Redevelopment

https://www.crainsnewyork.com/real-estate/price-tag-new-public-housing-chelsea-jumps-thanks-inflation-and-tariffs

After years of talk, the city is ready to tear down NYCHA’s Fulton and Elliott-Chelsea houses and replace them with 2,000 new apartments, an urgently needed move that could point the way forward for New York’s crumbling supply of public housing.

While city officials wait for the federal government’s green light to begin the work, the project’s price tag is rising rapidly.

It’s now expected to cost $1.9 billion to redevelop the Fulton and Elliott-Chelsea houses, according to a presentation given to Manhattan Community Board 4 in October. The price has probably risen further considering that last month the cost of iron and steel jumped by 4%, a rate the trade group Associated Builders and Contractors described Thursday as “particularly fast.” The $1.9 billion estimate marks a 25% increase over a forecast made in 2023.

3 Likes
4 Likes

Am I reading it correctly that they are replacing 2,056 current units with 2,000 or is it 2,000 on top of the existing amount of 2,056? If its the former then that seems short sighted, if anything it should be 4,000 units plus.

edit- scrolling back a bit this stood out to me.
-Roughly 3,500 new mixed-income apartments, including approximately 875 new affordable apartments, will be added to the campuses.

2 Likes

The article states as follows:

And the new development will include 3,500 market-rate apartments, allowing Essence and Related to charge rents that reflect the area’s high demand. Chelsea market rents aren’t modest: one listing advertises studio to two-bedroom units starting at $5,850 a month, a range that Adams confirms is realistic for the planned units. Many nearby apartments, listed at $12,000 a month on Zillow, illustrate the potential for high returns.

2 Likes

Per NYguy SSP https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showpost.php?p=10437884&postcount=17






8 Likes

Great! NYC’s housing projects have to be renovated/redeveloped/recladded etc etc. All of them.

3 Likes

I just wish there were some setbacks from the 9th Ave streetwall.

There should be no additional parking at NYCHA properties. So many projects have valuable real estate taken up by surface parking lots.

9 Likes

I never understood why NYCHA even had parking built, car ownership isn’t exactly cheap. I especially love almost getting run over by a BMW coming out of a NYCHA garage.

5 Likes

they can afford cars cause they pay $100 for rent lol

1 Like

LOL, thats true

Parking was a federal blanket rule for all of these kinds of housing projects across the nation when they were being built. Not great. My ex lives in HUD senior housing and cars are not considered an asset when determining income so you could inherit and buy an expensive car or get one from off the books income and still qualify.

8 Likes

ah, thanks for the information.

1 Like